Mark4321 wrote:

If you can get through to the right person, most companies will explain anything that is already public knowledge by way of their own hand or statements like a 10q's etc.

Asking a company to explain a legal term or action used in a court doc and made available in a pacer would have to be very significant to get an answer. In that event it was probably made public in a PR release. Of course they don't have time to answer every little question. The point is a shareholder friendly company doesn't hide behind NDA's. They want their story told, they only clam up when it's bad news. PTSC claim their hands are tied, but if it is public knowledge, to the extent that it is public, they can talk about it without risk of the NDA. That is just common sense.

We don't have a specific example, so it is hard to project a reasonable situation.

****************************************************************

All you needed to write is that you can't provide a specidic example. End of story!