Free
Message: Re: Hmmm
10
Dec 21, 2013 03:09PM
1
Dec 21, 2013 03:44PM
14
Dec 21, 2013 04:00PM
6
Dec 21, 2013 04:15PM
2
Dec 21, 2013 05:04PM
1
Dec 21, 2013 05:15PM
10
Dec 21, 2013 09:10PM
4
Dec 21, 2013 09:31PM
6
Dec 21, 2013 09:35PM
7
Dec 21, 2013 09:39PM
3
Dec 21, 2013 09:44PM
5
Dec 21, 2013 10:17PM
3
Dec 21, 2013 10:24PM
6
Dec 21, 2013 11:55PM
8
Dec 22, 2013 12:08AM
6
Dec 22, 2013 08:40AM
4
Dec 22, 2013 08:58AM
2
Dec 22, 2013 09:08AM
6
Dec 22, 2013 10:38AM
13
Dec 22, 2013 10:56AM

Dec 22, 2013 11:05AM
3
Dec 22, 2013 11:07AM

Dec 22, 2013 11:22AM
6
Dec 22, 2013 11:27AM
3
Dec 22, 2013 11:34AM
8
Dec 22, 2013 11:40AM
2
Dec 22, 2013 11:41AM
7
Dec 22, 2013 11:57AM
3
Dec 22, 2013 12:30PM
6
Dec 22, 2013 12:51PM
4
Dec 22, 2013 01:16PM
4
Dec 22, 2013 01:32PM
8
Dec 22, 2013 01:38PM
2
Dec 22, 2013 01:41PM
8
Dec 22, 2013 01:49PM
6
Dec 22, 2013 01:57PM
2
Dec 22, 2013 01:57PM
7
Dec 22, 2013 02:05PM
14
Dec 22, 2013 02:39PM
4
Dec 22, 2013 04:02PM

Dec 22, 2013 04:24PM
1
Dec 22, 2013 06:13PM
2
Dec 22, 2013 07:04PM
3
Dec 22, 2013 07:59PM

Dec 22, 2013 08:14PM
9
Dec 22, 2013 10:59PM
6
Dec 23, 2013 08:59AM

"It is a very strange outcome at this point."

Why is it strange? Because O'Shea rambles on over issues not directly related to the issues of the case?

The only thing that happened is the 20 of DEC was approaching and the Apple case closed prior to that.....then hanging up on its joinders to their SPJ considerations....very nasty if you ask me.

Similar circumstances have already concluded.....I see this as nothing other than the same conclusion....with a little drama added at the end.

Perhaps the drama was added for the purpose of stirring the pot and, not necessarily e.Digitals pot, but the publics.

doni

1
Dec 23, 2013 09:57AM
4
Dec 23, 2013 10:16AM
3
Dec 23, 2013 10:22AM
7
Dec 23, 2013 10:31AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply