Free
Message: Re: Hmmm
10
Dec 21, 2013 03:09PM
1
Dec 21, 2013 03:44PM
14
Dec 21, 2013 04:00PM
6
Dec 21, 2013 04:15PM
2
Dec 21, 2013 05:04PM
1
Dec 21, 2013 05:15PM
10
Dec 21, 2013 09:10PM
4
Dec 21, 2013 09:31PM
6
Dec 21, 2013 09:35PM
7
Dec 21, 2013 09:39PM
3
Dec 21, 2013 09:44PM
5
Dec 21, 2013 10:17PM
3
Dec 21, 2013 10:24PM
6
Dec 21, 2013 11:55PM
8
Dec 22, 2013 12:08AM
6
Dec 22, 2013 08:40AM
4
Dec 22, 2013 08:58AM
2
Dec 22, 2013 09:08AM
6
Dec 22, 2013 10:38AM
13
Dec 22, 2013 10:56AM

Dec 22, 2013 11:05AM
3
Dec 22, 2013 11:07AM

Dec 22, 2013 11:22AM
6
Dec 22, 2013 11:27AM
3
Dec 22, 2013 11:34AM
8
Dec 22, 2013 11:40AM
2
Dec 22, 2013 11:41AM
7
Dec 22, 2013 11:57AM
3
Dec 22, 2013 12:30PM
6
Dec 22, 2013 12:51PM
4
Dec 22, 2013 01:16PM
4
Dec 22, 2013 01:32PM
8
Dec 22, 2013 01:38PM
2
Dec 22, 2013 01:41PM
8
Dec 22, 2013 01:49PM
6
Dec 22, 2013 01:57PM
2
Dec 22, 2013 01:57PM
7
Dec 22, 2013 02:05PM
14
Dec 22, 2013 02:39PM
4
Dec 22, 2013 04:02PM

Dec 22, 2013 04:24PM
1
Dec 22, 2013 06:13PM
2
Dec 22, 2013 07:04PM
3
Dec 22, 2013 07:59PM

Dec 22, 2013 08:14PM
9
Dec 22, 2013 10:59PM

"If we get a positive appeal, will 774/737/108 be back in play on Apple with the 'with prejudice' we just saw?"

depends on the stipulations of the SPJ....

emit, all I can say is, SNDK settled its SPJ / 774 issues "with prejudice" as well....for all prior and current infringement matters.

Future infringement matters were not mentioned or considered...and for that, as I see things, SNDK dismissed its actions against e.Digital "with out prejudice" meaning they are standing by on guard.

I would say the same arrangements are with Apple and other defendants that settle 774 issues with out a court judgment.

IMO, for future infringement....it amounts to not much pay back...but blocking sales and stopping them at that point...to license the tech per item sold.

doni

1
Dec 23, 2013 09:09AM
1
Dec 23, 2013 09:57AM
4
Dec 23, 2013 10:16AM
3
Dec 23, 2013 10:22AM
7
Dec 23, 2013 10:31AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply