Re: Given EDIG's past involvement w/ AAPL wht do you think?
in response to
by
posted on
Oct 30, 2012 01:42PM
It seems logical to me that the addition of one clarifying word(media) to the body of a patent explanation would not be considered to be a substantial change that would cause us to only be able to sue for infringement from that point forward--though weird things do happen in the court system.