Free
Message: Re: For what it's worth
23
Nov 15, 2008 08:19AM
3
Nov 15, 2008 09:40AM

Nov 15, 2008 10:11AM
1
Nov 15, 2008 10:20AM
3
Nov 15, 2008 10:48AM
3
Nov 15, 2008 10:50AM
1
Nov 15, 2008 11:21AM
7
Nov 15, 2008 11:22AM
5
Nov 15, 2008 11:24AM
1
Nov 15, 2008 11:32AM

Nov 15, 2008 11:35AM

Nov 15, 2008 11:39AM
10
Nov 15, 2008 11:40AM
4
Nov 15, 2008 11:53AM
5
Nov 15, 2008 11:56AM
1
Nov 15, 2008 12:04PM
1
Nov 15, 2008 12:12PM
1
Nov 15, 2008 12:22PM
1
Nov 15, 2008 01:15PM
LL

Nov 15, 2008 01:15PM
3
Nov 15, 2008 01:31PM
4
Nov 15, 2008 02:07PM
4
Nov 15, 2008 02:09PM

Nov 15, 2008 02:24PM

"Being as upset as I was I failed to ask some pertinent questions and have NOt read the filings from yesterday, such as was the settlement or will the next settlements be for the entire range of EDig's patents or only for 774. I will keep that in mind for the next time. Just exactly what details are available to explain to us what the "cross licensing" means. He did touch on it by saying it gives EDig a much wider scope to utilize LG's patents, if needed. The impression given was there were no immediate plans to use any LG patents."

There is a lot to consider, however, the focus should be that one point, and that point only.

Thank you very much for your insight, I'm sure it is appreciated by many.

doni


Nov 15, 2008 04:19PM

Nov 15, 2008 04:27PM

Nov 15, 2008 04:32PM
1
Nov 15, 2008 04:43PM
2
Nov 15, 2008 04:45PM

Nov 15, 2008 05:33PM
5
Nov 16, 2008 03:04PM
2
Nov 16, 2008 03:23PM
4
Nov 16, 2008 03:58PM
1
Nov 16, 2008 04:10PM
7
Nov 16, 2008 04:11PM
4
Dec 16, 2008 03:15AM
1
Dec 30, 2008 09:33AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply