Often, in real life trial practice, you see bones like that one thrown to the side who is going to get on the short end of the stick, so far as the Judgment is the case in Chief is concerned...

I have not seen 159. Was it signed by Stewart the Judge assigned the case? Or by Nauber, (SP?), the "House keeping Judge!?" who is assignerd the processing the procedural matters...

His decisions are appealable, if grossly unreasoable, as this one seems to be. And his "spanking" of EDIG on "procedural" matters has has no great weight on whether EDIG sold their IFE to APS for $25,000, or are they are banned from competing in the IFE business for 7 years, or till 4/09?...

Just keep this thing in perspective...

(1) The Court in UTAH, has already held that EDIG can sell its eVU. This is conclusive on the non-issue that EDIG SOLD? ITS  IP for $25K.?...

(2) And even if BOW wins on his 7 year non-compete claim with respect to EDIG not selling any digE's, (which I highly doubt as he didn't even pay the $25000.00 dollar consideration!?), EDIG has not sold any digE's to any one since they broke up with BOW. Have they?...

GLTA...

Gil...