Aiming to become the global leader in chip-scale photonic solutions by deploying Optical Interposer technology to enable the seamless integration of electronics and photonics for a broad range of vertical market applications

Free
Message: Re: The CIC Revisited
20
Nov 11, 2016 04:17PM
21
Nov 12, 2016 03:49AM
14
Nov 12, 2016 07:36AM
18
Nov 12, 2016 08:57AM
28
Nov 12, 2016 01:12PM
8
Nov 12, 2016 03:01PM
5
Nov 12, 2016 03:29PM
10
Nov 12, 2016 04:13PM
22
Nov 12, 2016 04:31PM
8
Nov 12, 2016 04:58PM
15
Nov 12, 2016 05:25PM
11
Nov 12, 2016 05:31PM
11
Nov 12, 2016 05:49PM
5
Nov 12, 2016 06:30PM
5
Nov 12, 2016 06:31PM
2
Nov 12, 2016 06:39PM
16
Nov 12, 2016 07:13PM
10
Nov 12, 2016 07:39PM
3
Nov 12, 2016 07:48PM
5
Nov 12, 2016 07:51PM
4
Nov 12, 2016 09:44PM
6
Nov 12, 2016 09:57PM
13
Nov 12, 2016 10:14PM
9
Nov 13, 2016 12:23AM
8
Nov 13, 2016 01:06AM
17
Nov 13, 2016 03:09AM

Rainer you said

In other words, I wouldn't buy a single POET share just because of that very remote possibility. There are much better reasons to invest in POET, like the detector, the VCSEL transceiver, and the whole POET platform with its optoelectronical integration capabilities.

I totaly agree that VCSEL. Detector and AOC are the most compulsive reasons to be invested in PTK.

However, to use the term 'remote possibility' is ignoring a body of evidence up to the SUmmer of 2015. You undoubtedly have a unique capabilty to reason in ways many of us cannot, but why such a mental block on the possibility of an external develipment being in course. After all is that not what a strategy that includes licensing is all about.

Time warp back to the CIC when the team were putting forward a very compulsive reasons to be invested in PET with ring oscilators and many other electrical componets just about completed. A lot of people bought shares on this basis alone. Surely just because the screen went blank on this in June is not a reason to think it did not happen. If the onward development of PET into a processor or controller was taken on by a R&D department of anouther entitiy. Not a development PTI had the capacity to run with any chance of success at all, now VCSEL and Detector that is a different matter

I do rather feel that the TRAB was a Project Management Tool for an Apple development not a PTK POET development and it is a continuing process. 'remote possibility' is not rational. There is a distinct possibility that continuing TRAB meetings mean a partnership is being managed. Examining this should be part of our debate and not discarded.

sula

16
Nov 13, 2016 09:02AM
12
mo
Nov 13, 2016 09:53AM
12
Nov 13, 2016 09:57AM
11
Nov 13, 2016 10:38AM
24
Nov 13, 2016 10:55AM
11
mo
Nov 13, 2016 11:55AM
10
Nov 13, 2016 12:50PM
14
Nov 14, 2016 07:59AM
10
Nov 14, 2016 02:40PM
13
Nov 14, 2016 05:24PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply