Free
Message: Re: Agoracom/bankerson
4
Sep 13, 2015 05:31PM
2
Sep 14, 2015 09:03AM
6
Sep 14, 2015 11:43AM
6
Sep 14, 2015 04:35PM
9
Sep 14, 2015 06:51PM
8
Sep 15, 2015 08:15AM
4
Sep 15, 2015 10:07AM
4
Sep 15, 2015 10:40AM
4
Sep 15, 2015 10:49AM
3
Sep 15, 2015 10:54AM
14
Sep 15, 2015 11:54AM
7
Sep 15, 2015 12:21PM
2
Sep 15, 2015 12:22PM

Sep 15, 2015 12:24PM
3
Sep 15, 2015 12:30PM
5
Sep 15, 2015 01:58PM
6
Sep 15, 2015 02:08PM

Sep 15, 2015 02:28PM

Sep 15, 2015 02:40PM
6
Sep 15, 2015 02:47PM
5
Sep 15, 2015 03:14PM

IPR by itself can be a time-intensive process... 12-18 months easy.

Multiple IPRs can be filed against the same patents - even using the same arguments and by different companies.

You can get through one IPR (even have it refused by the PTAB) only to see another one filed. Patents are constantly being put under fire in this way.

Then we can talk about the court case... once the stay is lifted... months/years to get to trial, then waiting for final decision to be filed by the district court judge (after the jury has decided), then appeal to CAFC.

More IPRs can still be filed before the case is final.

Validity. Infringement. Damages. All 3 have to be proven and survive all appeals. It's a long hard road. Even longer when you keep starting over.

Litigation is just no way to run a business. Nothing is ever really 'proven', only argued indefinitely. What should be simple to you or me will be rendered not simple by the parties involved.

- Sinkman

8
Sep 15, 2015 04:06PM
1
Sep 15, 2015 04:10PM
6
Sep 15, 2015 06:41PM
2
Sep 15, 2015 06:51PM
1
Sep 15, 2015 07:03PM

Sep 15, 2015 07:10PM
2
Sep 16, 2015 01:17AM
6
Sep 16, 2015 08:14AM
1
Sep 16, 2015 10:05AM
2
Sep 16, 2015 01:22PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply