First of all, have not heard from you in a while, glad you are back Doni. The separation does seem important. I was also interested in the phrase--Intel's physical product "have no substantial non-infringing uses". Isn't a double negative a positive? They have no non-infringing? Doesn't that read that they are substantially infringing? Just wishful thinking or is the judge saying he believes infringing is occurring and thus denied the request to drop the case?