Free
Message: Re: Once filed, the requester cannot “unfile” the reexam as part of a settlement !
3
Sep 23, 2011 02:05PM
3
Sep 23, 2011 02:42PM
1
Sep 23, 2011 02:44PM
1
Sep 23, 2011 02:57PM
1
Sep 23, 2011 03:15PM
7
Sep 23, 2011 04:00PM
4
Sep 23, 2011 06:56PM
11
Sep 23, 2011 09:24PM
12
Sep 23, 2011 09:47PM
9
Sep 24, 2011 03:02PM
8
Sep 24, 2011 10:34PM
7
Sep 25, 2011 12:58AM
2
Sep 25, 2011 09:39AM

Maybe Edig thinks that there is a strong chance that, while taking more time, a re-exam has a significant chance of going in their favor. Afterall, Woody, Fred et al are supposed to be attending the meetings with the patent office people instead of leaving it up to a judge with a sketchy track record(Phillips case). They took a chance that the judge would see the light which would have shortened the process knowing full well that they had faith in the re-exam in the longer run. Is it possible that during settlement negotiations EDIG said to HTC "if you file for a re-exam(which cannot be unfiled even after a settlement) we will settle with you for X amount--sort of a win/win? Then, together with other recent on the small side settlements , the company will definitely make it cash flow-wise beyond the final re-exam results(+- a year from now). Just trying to figure out the puzzle that is EDIG. GLTA

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply