Free
Message: PACER Samsung AND 774 PATENT
12
Apr 03, 2009 08:55AM
1
Apr 03, 2009 09:00AM
4
Apr 03, 2009 09:02AM
1
Apr 03, 2009 09:06AM
1
Apr 03, 2009 09:07AM
6
Apr 03, 2009 09:17AM
8
Apr 03, 2009 09:22AM

Apr 03, 2009 09:26AM
1
Apr 03, 2009 09:31AM

Apr 03, 2009 09:33AM

Apr 03, 2009 09:35AM
1
Apr 03, 2009 09:39AM
1
Apr 03, 2009 09:40AM
4
Apr 03, 2009 10:02AM
1
Apr 03, 2009 11:35AM

Apr 03, 2009 11:53AM
2
Apr 03, 2009 12:23PM
7
Apr 03, 2009 02:13PM
3
Apr 03, 2009 02:32PM
2
Moo
Apr 03, 2009 02:36PM
13
Apr 03, 2009 06:42PM
4
Apr 03, 2009 08:11PM
6
Apr 03, 2009 08:25PM
2
Apr 03, 2009 11:52PM
25
Apr 04, 2009 06:16AM

Apr 04, 2009 06:32AM
1
Apr 04, 2009 06:35AM

Apr 04, 2009 06:48AM

Apr 04, 2009 07:11AM
2
Apr 04, 2009 07:17AM
20
Apr 04, 2009 07:22AM
2
Apr 04, 2009 07:33AM
6
Apr 04, 2009 07:36AM
4
Apr 04, 2009 07:39AM

Apr 04, 2009 07:46AM
1
Apr 04, 2009 07:50AM
1
Apr 04, 2009 08:03AM
3
Apr 04, 2009 08:05AM
1
Apr 04, 2009 08:10AM
3
Apr 04, 2009 08:11AM
1
Apr 04, 2009 08:30AM

Apr 04, 2009 08:40AM

Apr 04, 2009 08:58AM
3
Apr 04, 2009 08:58AM
1
Apr 04, 2009 09:00AM
1
Apr 04, 2009 09:05AM

Apr 04, 2009 09:06AM
4
Apr 04, 2009 09:10AM
2
Apr 04, 2009 09:24AM
4
Apr 04, 2009 09:26AM
2
Apr 04, 2009 09:29AM
2
Apr 04, 2009 09:32AM

Apr 04, 2009 11:12AM
9
Apr 04, 2009 11:17AM

Apr 04, 2009 11:38AM
5
Apr 04, 2009 11:42AM
2
Apr 04, 2009 02:49PM
2
Apr 04, 2009 02:55PM
1
Apr 04, 2009 02:56PM
By reviewing of Samsung and e.DIGITAL pacers it appears all along the strategy
of DUANE MORRIS is based on patent 774.It is already disclosed by SAMSUNG
that e.DIGITAL shifted its theory for infringement products based on 774 patent.
Some of the following passages from several dockets are indicative of strong
connection of infringers products and their relation to this patent.
The significant variety of products and their distribution in mass
market are indicative of if we reach a settlement with SAMSUNG it will be indeed
a significant compensation for e.DIGITAL.



"Samsung also believes that e.Digital
has shifted its theory of infringement in each new version of its Infringement Contentions,
including the latest, served on February 20, 2009.
"
e.Digital’s Investigation of the Accused Products The accused Samsung products are handheld recording/playback devices, which are alleged to infringe the patents-in-suit because they are capable of recording sound data onto flash memory as claimed in the asserted apparatus and method claims.
e.Digital’s Investigation of the Accused Pr oducts The accused Samsung products are handheld recording/playback devices, which are alleged to infringe t he patents-in-suit because they are capable of recording sound data onto flash memory as claimed in the asserted apparatus and method claims.
Indeed, the claims of the asserted patents are broad in scope and focus on the fundamental aspects of using flash memory to record and store audio data on handheld recording/playback devices such as modern cameras, camcorders, and mobile phones. e.Digital’s claim charts, therefore, identified the components of the accused products .
MAJORITY 110
OUT OF 136 INFRINGERS PRODUCTS OF SAMSUNG CAMERA AND ETC HAS BEEN USING ZORAN
COACH PROCESSOR “control circuitry includes a Digital Support
Processor (DSP).” (See U.S. Patent No. 5,491,774 (the “‘774 Patent”)
Importantly, Samsung does not dispute that the Zoran COACH processor was correctly
identified and is found in many of the accused Samsung cameras
.
Currently, e.Digital has identified five camcorders that it first identified in February 2009 and that appear to be functionally equivalent to previously accused camcorders. Those five camcorders are identified in the Motion at footnote 10 and are discussed in footnote 9, supra. When e.Digital confirms that those products should be added to the list of accused products based on sales in the United States, it will seek leave of the Court to add them.
e.Digital first identified 71 of these 76 products on November 21 when it served its Initial Infringement Contentions.The new websites include: qctconnect.com, maxim-ic.com, qimonda.com, focus.ti.com, datasheetpro.com, datasheetcatalog.org, datasheetdir.com, kr.ic-on-line.cn, alldatasheet.com, datasheet4u.com, datasheetarchive.com, digchip.com, tw.ic-on-line.cn, ic-on-line.cn, cn.ic-on-line.cn, jp.ic-on-line.cn, ic-cn.com.cn, soft.laogu.com, nanya.com, and penguin.cz. Examples of the foregoing websites in foreign languages are attached as Ex. E to the Yungwirth Declaration. With respect to the five other products, e.Digital discovered those camcorders in February 2009 when it searched for service manuals on www.manualuniverse.com, as directed by Samsung. According to the service manuals and related product documentation for three of (Continued…)
8
three months later -- on February 20 and 25 -- when it provided sworn declarations from its employees in support of its allegation. e.Digital immediately informed Samsung that while the declarants’ allegations are contrary to e.Digital’s initial investigation, it agreed to remove the identified products from the list of accused products, until such time as “discovery shows that the products identified by Samsung were so ld, offered for sale or imported into the United States as e.Digital initially believed. . . .”
(Yungwirth Decl. at Ex. F, p. 3).
AND FINALLY " Importantly, Samsung does not dispute that the Zoran COACH proc essor was correctly
identified and is found in many of the accused Samsung cameras
."
2
Apr 04, 2009 03:23PM
4
Apr 04, 2009 03:42PM

Apr 04, 2009 04:05PM

Apr 04, 2009 04:23PM
2
Apr 04, 2009 05:46PM
3
Apr 04, 2009 05:53PM
2
Apr 04, 2009 07:49PM

Apr 04, 2009 07:57PM
3
Apr 04, 2009 08:30PM
5
Apr 05, 2009 05:01AM
2
Apr 06, 2009 03:30AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply