Free
Message: Re: Pacer-e.DIGITAL vs Motorola,Non-Infring... patent 774 & 108 without prejudice
19
Sep 21, 2013 12:18PM

Why would that necessarily be true if the patent that has been infringed upon is critical to the operation of the device? If the device is rendered ineffective by it's absence why would more infringemnet be worth more money?

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply