Free
Message: Re: This Qualcomm context awareness mobile platform still not approved by USPTO !
9
Mar 20, 2013 11:09AM
5
Mar 20, 2013 11:36AM
5
Mar 20, 2013 11:41AM
4
Mar 20, 2013 11:50AM
10
Mar 20, 2013 12:10PM
6
Mar 20, 2013 12:18PM
2
Mar 20, 2013 12:25PM
2
Mar 20, 2013 12:32PM
2
Mar 20, 2013 12:40PM
2
Mar 20, 2013 12:45PM
4
Mar 20, 2013 12:47PM
4
Mar 20, 2013 12:51PM
3
Mar 20, 2013 01:11PM

Mar 20, 2013 01:27PM
4
Mar 20, 2013 01:27PM
7
Mar 20, 2013 01:38PM
4
Mar 20, 2013 01:42PM
1
Mar 20, 2013 01:51PM
3
Mar 20, 2013 01:58PM
5
Mar 20, 2013 02:46PM
3
Mar 20, 2013 02:54PM
5
Mar 20, 2013 03:10PM

Mar 20, 2013 03:17PM
4
Mar 20, 2013 03:45PM
4
Mar 20, 2013 03:54PM
13
Mar 20, 2013 04:33PM
8
Mar 20, 2013 08:46PM
8
Mar 21, 2013 11:14AM

I refer you to the difference in the two as descibed in the trademarks.

Gimbal is task specific, NUNCHI is the whole enchilada.

Take geofencing for example, Gimbal has it, TextOnHold has it, so does NUNCHI, however; NUNCHI does something with location information, a break in one's routine, to offer safety. Just one of many differences as to how NUNCHI tech takes it to the next level.

Trillium et al: Gimbal vs NUNCHI

posted on Mar 18, 13 09:09AM Use the IP Check tool [?]
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply