Free
Message: Re: CONTRIBUTORY PATENT INFRINGEMENT
2
Jul 27, 2009 06:16PM
8
Jul 27, 2009 08:35PM

Jul 27, 2009 09:01PM
8
Jul 27, 2009 09:34PM
14
Jul 27, 2009 10:46PM
1
Jul 28, 2009 12:51AM
16
Jul 28, 2009 01:21AM
4
Jul 28, 2009 01:43AM
6
Jul 28, 2009 07:25AM
3
Jul 28, 2009 11:45AM
9
Jul 28, 2009 12:00PM
5
Jul 28, 2009 12:29PM
16
Jul 28, 2009 12:29PM
3
Jul 28, 2009 01:01PM

Jul 28, 2009 01:01PM
8
Jul 28, 2009 01:02PM
7
Jul 28, 2009 01:03PM
3
Jul 28, 2009 01:14PM
1
Jul 28, 2009 01:49PM
2
Jul 28, 2009 01:56PM
2
Jul 28, 2009 02:22PM
2
Jul 28, 2009 02:49PM
9
Jul 28, 2009 05:43PM
21
Jul 28, 2009 06:41PM
1
Jul 31, 2009 09:48AM
1
Jul 31, 2009 09:57AM
1
Jul 31, 2009 10:03AM

Sman....you are on top of this with understanding.....

This is a great board......

Who formats what and how....and how is the data transmitted....if its directly off a module memory....and you remove that memory and the bit stream stops....you are going to be on the list.

Shadow files vs. paging files in a particular manner and secondary PASS THROUGH memory set(e.Digital).....IS THE ARGUEMENT.

A stream of audio...or a stream of video.....it's utilizing the same principles. As for 445 and 108 they allow for advanced format....however, to infringe on the "module memory pulling theory" the data does not have to be using an advanced format.....though similar.....or utilizing contiguous data arrangements.

They will get their point across...that secondary memory arrangement of high speed SRAM, is specifically sized to whatever the particular flash architecture is involved(read/ write block size). It's the KEY without paging off of standard RAM configurations....they do it right off of flash.

This I have been trying to explain for many years now...and this IMO is the low hanging fruit.

445 and 108 turn the flash into MAIN memory....where normally DRAM type memory is the main memory utilized on a boot up.

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply