Free
Message: Re: SOME INTERESTING PARTS OF DOC 147 SAMSUNG vs EDIG 5-
9
Mar 17, 2009 06:03PM
4
Mar 17, 2009 06:30PM

Mar 17, 2009 06:44PM
2
Mar 17, 2009 06:55PM

Mar 17, 2009 06:59PM
6
Mar 17, 2009 07:02PM
1
Mar 17, 2009 07:10PM
1
Mar 17, 2009 07:19PM
2
Mar 18, 2009 02:15AM

"Samsung argues that e.Digital’s Amended Contentions are deficient because they do not explain the method by which the accused Samsung products “write[] and store[] data to flash memory without using the traditional file allocation tables found in nearly all file memory systems.”

"Apparently, Samsung intends to advocate a construction of the claims to which it refers that excludes the linking described in the contentions by characterizing that type of linking as a traditional file allocation table. Accordingly, Samsung requests that the Court prematurely embrace Samsung’s construction by refusing to accept as sufficient e.Digital’s infringement contentions and instead, compel e.Digital to rephrase its contention so that Samsung can use the rephrased contention against e.Digital during the claim construction process."

This is good....DM is going after more than the low hanging fruit.....lol

wow, Samsung is trying to confuse the Architecture of e.Digitals patents with status quo methods.

As long as they keep spelling it out the court will see what is going on.

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply