Free
Message: Re: SOME INTERESTING PARTS OF DOC 147 SAMSUNG vs EDIG CONCLUSION
9
Mar 17, 2009 06:03PM
4
Mar 17, 2009 06:30PM

Mar 17, 2009 06:44PM
2
Mar 17, 2009 06:55PM

Mar 17, 2009 06:59PM
6
Mar 17, 2009 07:02PM
1
Mar 17, 2009 07:10PM
1
Mar 17, 2009 07:19PM
2
Mar 18, 2009 02:15AM


CONCLUSION
12 Currently, e.Digital has identified five camcorders that it first identified in February 2009 and that appear to be functionally equivalent to previously accused camcorders. Those five camcorders are identified in the Motion at footnote 10 and are discussed in footnote 9, supra. When e.Digital confirms that those products should be added to the list of accused products based on sales in the United States, it will seek leave of the Court to add them.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply