Leb:

Why did I think you were providing some information related to Rockley’s platform?

I asked you the following in a post:

Have you seen anything that relates to Rockley's footprint or power consumption, insertion loss, transmission loss, RF limits. Try and find it. It's pretty much out in the open for POET. 

You posted the following which I thought was a response to that question:

Finally, here is a post to a comprehensive technical paper from the team at Rockley Photonics detailing the challenges and opportunities in co-packaged optics for datacenters. The paper describes the evolution of datacenter switch ASICs, datacenter optics, roadmap challenges and co-packaged optics for addressing these challenges.

 Interesting to note that multiple CAI employees, inckuding Preet Virk and Ankur, "liked" the post regarding Rockley's technical paper (and are much more qualified than some on this board)

 https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ramtrichur_siliconphotonics-cpo-advancedpackaging-activity-689108

8237763416064-FGRi

We trust these experts with the technical details, and of course Vivek, who is also on the CAI Technical Advisory Board along with Near Margalit who replaced Alexis at Broadcom (who is also on the BOD in her Meta role): https://www.celestial.ai/team

……………………………………….

You seemed to imply that because people at CAI “liked” that post that it was an endorsement of Rockley?

If I misread that then I apologize. It sounded like you were taking a shot like you often do when I attempt to engage with you.

The question still stands. Rockley has had huge funding and they have developed a product which apparently as pointed out they have advanced by two years. Now I watched a video where a money person/talking head was complaining that it was 3 years away or something like that and the argument was why  would you invest today for something that may or may not enter the market in such a long time frame?

Anyway it was a good clip and if anyone finds it please post it in the off topic. It really made me wonder whether the 2 years of acceleration for deployment was more about getting something out for investors to hang onto  without further revision or improvement.