HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Are we under-valued ? faulty logic, Ed?
38
Feb 14, 2010 06:30PM
22
Feb 14, 2010 11:05PM
6
Feb 15, 2010 12:39AM
13
Feb 15, 2010 06:13PM
3
Feb 15, 2010 07:42PM
16
Feb 15, 2010 10:57PM
9
Feb 16, 2010 07:56AM
10
Feb 16, 2010 09:14AM
14
Feb 16, 2010 10:29AM


I can't argue against your point Dvdgray, right on.
What they agreed upon must be fair to all. My point was that if cliffs valued
the property at 4$ then my argument is that they could have paid as much as 2$
instead of 1. Yes, the old addage, could have, might have etc.

My comment was that Freewest could have held out for more. Again, this is with
hind sight - who has that? But it is a lesson.
But the main point is that if Freewest holders could have held out then we
should be aware of what we could be worth and not sell too quickly if our
opportunity comes.

Sum4all, even if we intend to build a mine that does not preclude an offer.
When there is no news or any other developments then what have you got remaining? Yes, those lofty dreams and a whole lot of time to put them to print.
When we put to print our hopes and dreams we are not selling them to children, but to adults that should do their investigation and proper reasoning.

You and I are not being renumerated for our opinions so disclaimers do not apply here. They take their risks with the rest of us.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply