HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Are we under-valued ?
38
Feb 14, 2010 06:30PM
22
Feb 14, 2010 11:05PM
6
Feb 15, 2010 12:39AM
13
Feb 15, 2010 06:13PM
3
Feb 15, 2010 07:42PM

Sum4all, your house annology is not only invalid but inappropriate, imo.

I compared a neighbour's assets to ours. Practically apples to apples and not apples to bricks. If there is any invalidity in that it is that we are only partly in chromite and mostly in other metals and perhaps also due to Cliffs having an incentive for going after the largest chromite deposit.

Cliffs paid five times for what the market was giving for Freewest and now a valuation surfaced of 20 times. I used an in between number of 10 and applied to Noront recent low price to present a possible hoped for price.
What is inappropriate with that?

So we are not all chromite, but nickel is a necessary metal in steel production also.

Finally I would think that no one would say that it has to be Cliffs to be interested in us. There are other possible parties that may be interested in us for other reasons, also paying premium price and perhaps be willing to sell off or partner up on assets not of main interest to them if necessary.

9
Feb 16, 2010 07:56AM
10
Feb 16, 2010 09:14AM
14
Feb 16, 2010 10:29AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply