rodg45: Visible copper sulphides is not the same as visible copper...

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Bentonstocks

Rank: President [?]

Points: 6383 [?]

Votes: 291 Score: 3.8 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

rodg45: Visible copper sulphides is not the same as visible copper...

in response to

Re: "Eagle 3" (DE3) has not landed... yet. - YES IT HAS!!!

rodg45

posted on Apr 02, 2008 01:57PM

I think you may be jumping the gun a bit on your rock value estimations for AT3...

There is a diffrenece between visble copper sulphides and visible copper. Although they mention visible copper mineralization in the highlights section of the NR, they consistently refer to the visuals as being of copper sulphides in the detailed decription of the results of AT3.