To say that "Eagle 3 has not landed" because this recent news release did not use the words from the title of the earlier news release "Eagle 2 has landed" is, to put it kindly, not good logic. The visuals speak for themselves -- and management should not be expected to use an expression like "the eagle has landed" to be understood as saying that they are not happy with what they've drilled. To put this simply, you are taking a position that unless they say in the exact words "Eagle 3 has landed" then nothing worthwhile has been found at Eagle 3. That is like saying if you don't use the word 'Go' then that is not the equivalent of 'Move Forward'. Please - let's not discredit the report for what it says.