rodg45: Visible copper sulphides is not the same as visible copper...
in response to
by
HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"
NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)
Message: rodg45: Visible copper sulphides is not the same as visible copper...
Your Vote:
Did you know?
You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)
I think you may be jumping the gun a bit on your rock value estimations for AT3...
There is a diffrenece between visble copper sulphides and visible copper. Although they mention visible copper mineralization in the highlights section of the NR, they consistently refer to the visuals as being of copper sulphides in the detailed decription of the results of AT3.
Maybe " been there" can comment more on this...
Regards,
B.
6 Recommendations
Loading...
Loading...
12
Apr 02, 2008 02:04PM
6
Apr 02, 2008 02:08PM
5
Apr 02, 2008 02:14PM
8
Apr 02, 2008 02:18PM
3
Apr 02, 2008 02:22PM
4
Apr 02, 2008 02:31PM
1
Apr 02, 2008 02:55PM
New Message
Please
login
to post a reply