Re: caney and all, re problems with Leckrone.....
in response to
by
posted on
Aug 11, 2011 06:27PM
< tpl needed the other 50% of the mmp, >
I do not believe that is an accurate statement.
I do not believe I'm missing the point. I interjected my 2 cents when the converstation turned to Leckrone's history and whether PTSC should have known who they were dealing with. My point being we had little choice but to deal with Leckrone.
I don't know for a fact that PTSC could have done better, but I have no problem with your opinion or others that PTSC could have gotten a better deal.
Hope that clarifies.
Opty