what if he did? it has no real bearing on the BOD issue. the ma was definetly not in our best interest and i dont really know what stan was told to sign off on it. he could have been told that our forensic cpa was going to watch the books and guard the shareholder interest, we have attorneys that will protect us. i dont know. maybe he knew the agreement was bad and took the money to sign off. i just dont see this issue as being the one that is holding ptsc back. we are talking about our stock price moving up? that is the issue i am concerned about.

i do know he is a shareholder and did not sell his holdings. i dont know stan. if this is all about stan running for the bod, i thought he removed himself. as far as i know there is no ballot of names. so stan is not credible in you opinion. thats okay with me.

so lets toss stan out of the picture....who should we pick to blame for .08/.10 stock price and a list of bad investments?

the focus should be the BOD. they make the decisions and they are really well paid for making them. has the bod increased share holder value or not?

is the bod credible? they received compensation for drawing up the ma?

like i said, selective outrage.

teremoto