bang that drum.......bid 0.81 ask .10......thats 8 cents and 10 cents......kinda hard to mount some sort of a campaign to push this much lower. the only self serving that is going on is in our corporate boardroom. maybe u have not noticed but this stock has been flat lined for a long time. because of post refelecting displeasure at the beahvior of our BOD? maybe, or could the price actually reflect the companys achievements?......if a company's directors choose a corporate policy where no news or details can be disclosed and mismanage the treasury, then might this be the anchor on our share price?....but its probably the posts on this forum that really dictate the price....just what might the agenda be? to acquire more stock at even lower prices.......the accumulation has been going on for a few years now. just when will that boat be loaded and the good ship PTSC be allowed to sail onward and upward? you seem to answer every post that does not paint PTSC as an innocent victim. whats your agenda? maybe if the BOD stepped down and allowed a new team with a new vision try to steer the good ship then the little "good news" that we are privelidged to be informed about would reflect in an upward stock price. mind boggling.....dribble...dribble.....bang the drum.....its someone elses fault...not the ones that are in charge and placed the company in such a position. Hard to believe a BOD member had the nerve to chastise a large share holder that they were not smart enough to disregard a flurry of PR's to run the price up for an insider to unload million of shares and sell their shares.....go figure....stan was one that could be considered an insider...he was a warrant holder......yet he bought into the news released by the company in this time frame and did not sell his vast holdings......wow....the only one that really managed to do well was S&L....and they still have a representative running the company. wonder why stan never sold out with S&L? uhmmmmm.

teremoto