Now there's an idea. Charles Moore used to have the technology (MMP) and because of the way things worked out he gave up his claims except for the fact that TPL would be the distributor. He and PTSC are subject to TPL's decissions and also their licensing fees. How ironic that if Charles Moore needs the patent he invented and has to pay someone else to get it. Maybe that is what all the heated arguing has been about and why the loan or ? for 980K was paid out by PTSC. It seems clear as mud, but I think you may be on to something.