Since thge Feb 23rd Discovery claims issues has passed, and we have the most recent Pacers by Tosh, MEI, NEC (&Arm) and it appears that we see no mention, claims nor exhibits (sealed or not) pertaining to prior art.. can it be assumed that the defendents are not using prior art as a defense in the upcoming trial?  If they do plan on using prior art def, wouldn't it have been mentioned in the Pacer filings?

thanks... hope yours are doing great