As I have stated before many of you before, I do not feel the drill core that is strewn everywhere upon the Tesoro, is from the Tesoro. I feel the drill logs need to be consulted for drill hole location, then the diameter of the casing left at the drill hole collars, be measured. Most of the drill core in the photos look to be about 4 inch diameter, but Lori had stated, that some 2 1/2 inch holes were drilled before switching to the bigger and more expensive (usually) 4 inch. If, for some reason, the drill collars revealed mostly 2 1/2 drill holes, then this would prove the inconsistency I feel with the drill core.

Also, even though hard to tell from photos, the drill core we see, should have had multiple stringers and mineralized areas in it,where it appears mostly barren, this is not consistent with the Quantec and historic data. Also, the shade/color of the host rock in the cores in the photos, does not seem to match the shades in underground photos of the couple mine shafts. Although light and color depictions may vary from camera to camera, it still feels an inconsistent color.

I also recall a satelitte photo I looked at of a drill collar that had several, perhaps close to seven holes drilled from the one collar. This photo was taken somewhere close to where drill holes in the 40,s of the drill plan. On the old private investor board, I did a couple posts predicting what the holes in the 40 range, should have sampled. I stand by those predictions yet today, even though the news released shows them as having very little. I put a lot of time and study into predicting those holes, and to simply put it, Lori,s actual drill results for those holes are also inconsistent with the Quantec and historic data.

Its exactly the same everytime you try to apply the drill results to the actual areas, a total diconnect from historic data and the Quantec. The Quantec does not lie, unless it is tampered with. But, if the Quantec was tampered with, then it would mean all historicdata and more importantly, historic data from the region, was false, and that is totally unrealistic to even think historic data from the region is false. Because there is too much data and sat images of mines in the area which quickly assures all area historic data is correct at least to the degree that mineralization there was sufficient and economical to mine. We must not forget all the copper mines in the immediate area that are/were seen from sat images, the same copper mines that 2 geos at least, tried to deny to me that any existed near the Tesoro. A blatant cover up scam, exposed......