Misleading statements constitute fraud. IF Lori,s statements about Quantec and Kevin Killan were FALSE, or any of the numerous favorable statements about the properties she made were FALSE, then they become falsehoods which are simply punishable by criminal law as per the excerpt from the criminal code at the end of this post.

There is also an aspect of Canadian criminal law under the Competition act which can be utilized in our case as well, along the lines of "false advertising". In this link;

http://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/eng/00513.html

Early in the investigation, reports coming from the RCMP were "she was very misleading" and; "we should have been called 2 years ago". This plainly tells you that very early in the RCMP investigation, that the RCMP were not guessing, they actually SAW how these statements appeared very misleading. The only way for the RCMP to have changed their mind on this, WAS IF LORI WAS TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT ALL OF THE GOLD PRIOR TO THE INITIAL DRILL RESULTS. So, the RCMP DID change their mind, that her statements were NOT misleading, and THE ONLY way her statements cannot be misleading, IS THAT THE TESORO is very RICH. Then you can plainly see that SOMEONE POWERFUL is pulling the strings here in an ATTEMPT TO KEEP THIS COVERED UP. The RCMP will NOT move on LORI, BECAUSE in a court of law, THE TRUTH ABOUT THE HUGE COVER UP WOULD COME OUT AND BE KNOWN PUBLICLY. As a result of this realization, the GREED HAS chosen to tell ALL REGULATORS and AUTHORITY, to STAND DOWN, which instantly gives Lori the amnesty you are witnessing. Therefore, you may readily conclude that this is indeed a CONSPIRACY which involves collusion at levels HIGHER than government bodies.

Here is the criminal code aspect once again dealing with fraud.

Fraud

• 380. (1) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, defrauds the public or any person, whether ascertained or not, of any property, money or valuable security or any service,

  • (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding fourteen years, where the subject-matter of the offence is a testamentary instrument or the value of the subject-matter of the offence exceeds five thousand dollars; or

  • (b) is guilty

    • (i) of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or

    • (ii) of an offence punishable on summary conviction,

    where the value of the subject-matter of the offence does not exceed five thousand dollars.

• Marginal note:Minimum punishment

  (1.1) When a person is prosecuted on indictment and convicted of one or more offences referred to in subsection (1), the court that imposes the sentence shall impose a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of two years if the total value of the subject-matter of the offences exceeds one million dollars.

• Marginal note:Affecting public market

  (2) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, with intent to defraud, affects the public market price of stocks, shares, merchandise or anything that is offered for sale to the public is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

• 380.1 (1) Without limiting the generality of section 718.2, where a court imposes a sentence for an offence referred to in section 380, 382, 382.1 or 400, it shall consider the following as aggravating circumstances:

  • (a) the magnitude, complexity, duration or degree of planning of the fraud committed was significant;

  • (b) the offence adversely affected, or had the potential to adversely affect, the stability of the Canadian economy or financial system or any financial market in Canada or investor confidence in such a financial market;

  • (c) the offence involved a large number of victims;

  • (c.1) the offence had a significant impact on the victims given their personal circumstances including their age, health and financial situation;

  • (d) in committing the offence, the offender took advantage of the high regard in which the offender was held in the community;

  • (e) the offender did not comply with a licensing requirement, or professional standard, that is normally applicable to the activity or conduct that forms the subject-matter of the offence; and

  • (f) the offender concealed or destroyed records related to the fraud or to the disbursement of the proceeds of the fraud.

  • http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/FullText.html#h-103