Welcome To the WIN!!! St. Elias Mines HUB On AGORACOM

Keep in mind, the opinions on this site are for the most part speculation and are not necessarily the opinions of the company WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Free
Message: Re: A revolt...
11
Mar 04, 2015 04:05AM
12
Mar 04, 2015 05:09AM

I would concur with this quote, however, its the greed above the governments, that needs to be dissolved. It hasn,t in the past, and will not in the future, matter which political party is in power in Canada, because of the high end greed that controls governments. Governments are mere puppets for the elite and do their bidding by enacting laws to protect facets of the elite, and to NOT enact laws that protect the people.

Banks are offered huge amnesty by the governments, even though you have seen countless times, and continue to do so, criminal activity that involves robbing the people all around the world. If governments were for the people, these organized crime rings, the banks, would be shut down by simple liscense suspensions, instead of the ridiculous pleading of no wrong doing and then opting for out of court settlements, which allow these banks to continue robbing the people. If there ever was such a thing as a government for its people, laws would have been enacted 100 years ago to shut these banks down at the first sign of criminal activity, plain and simple. But in reality, the governments are in collusion with the banks, as evidenced in the "Luxembourg Leaks", where it was clearly shown how a few Canadian government pension plans were tax schemes that burdened other common people of the world, and these schemes were organized and endorsed by the banks, for the governments. So again, in reality, you see the banks assuring the RCMP and CRA pension funds and the government paying the banks to perform these tax schemes at the expense of tax payers.

How have the banks hurt the SLI shareholders to date?

Answer;

They have hurt the SLI shareholders in many ways.

1) Most shareholders saw the ridiculous excuses and efforts made by certain banks to thwart our important voting process, by not being cooperative, supplying misinformation on voting instruction and not allowing some shareholders to vote their shares. It is plain to see that this was done intentionally by the banks, and perhaps your first guess as to why they did this, is the correct one, money.

2) The banks own the TSX and are responsible for assuring integrity of the Exchange through its self regulators, IIROC and the TSX Compliance department, do you see these departments assisting and working with SLI shareholders to resolve the numerous problems we have encountered? No. And why is that? Perhaps its because the banks have an interest in this SLI company , and interest great enough to warrant them jeopardizing the integrity of the market.

3) The banks, known as trading houses in the markets, were responsible for conducting and allowing trades that took our stock price to near nothing. There was collusion on the part of several banks in this orchestrated take down of the stock price, with RBC as one of the prominent houses which executed many destructive trades, either by themselves and/or on another parties part, either way, orchestrating and/or accomplicing a crime.

4) Banks contributed to and endorsed naked short selling of SLI. To my knowledge, all of this naked short position has not been covered yet. In shorting and naked shorting, shares have to be available by the banks, for the shorters to buy back, this prerequisite is supposed to be reassured so that an inbalance of a company,s trading shares does not transpire as a result of these practices, yet it did in our case, which again, is unfavorable for SLI shareholders.

5) All Market Makers are to be registered, monitored and have rules to operate under. This means that the banks KNOW EXACTLY what Market Makers are assigned to each stock. Shareholders have launched complaints about the Market Making activity, to no avail, which allowed the stock price to be continuously pressured. Market Makers are ALLOWED to create stock out of thin air, phantom shares, in their market making abilities, which always gives them control of moving a stock, EVEN if not ONE original share is sold on the market. In reality, this is market manipulation, but the banks, endorse this practice.

There is more, but I will stop here, you get the picture, right?

Thank You

Rick Jewers

1
Mar 04, 2015 01:56PM
8
Mar 04, 2015 02:33PM
10
Mar 04, 2015 03:01PM

Mar 04, 2015 04:02PM
8
Mar 04, 2015 04:09PM
5
Mar 04, 2015 05:14PM
15
Mar 04, 2015 06:05PM
11
Mar 04, 2015 07:24PM
10
Mar 04, 2015 08:40PM
11
Mar 04, 2015 10:19PM
11
Mar 05, 2015 01:36AM
10
Mar 05, 2015 01:40AM
15
Mar 05, 2015 06:33AM
1
Mar 05, 2015 09:00AM
13
Mar 05, 2015 09:05AM

Mar 05, 2015 09:51AM
11
Mar 05, 2015 11:46AM
9
Mar 05, 2015 12:05PM
9
Mar 05, 2015 01:40PM
11
Mar 05, 2015 03:12PM

Mar 05, 2015 03:30PM
13
Mar 05, 2015 03:42PM

Mar 05, 2015 03:58PM
8
Mar 05, 2015 04:17PM
14
Mar 05, 2015 04:55PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply