These directors were never really ratified by shareholders and were more or less entrenched by current management. Furthermore, I agree, it seems quite odd that "deals" and "buyouts" were talked about after the FACT that the first drill results released were totally inconclusive and to the top of the vague scale. Also, these directors had to have been screened 2 weeks prior, so it was all orchestrated to delete any directors that may question her behaviour. I wish to inform those directors that were forced to resign, that no confidentialty agreement is valid or enforce, if there is wrongdoing be concealed by these directors not coming forth. In other words, there are several provisions contained within law that renders confidentialty agreements void in such cases and the directors themselves could be charged at a later date if it is discovering that they were aiding in the concealment of wrong doing. As corrupt lawyers and judges are being weeded out of judicial systems globally on a weekly basis, this transition of judicial systems is balancing the scales of justice, where they used to be laden in favour of the corrupt and rich, they are begining to perhaps be a little more fair. It is well known that the judicial system of B.C., especially Vancouver, has been run rampant with corruption and this is a target as well at the present time.