Re: another misleading statement?
in response to
by
posted on
Aug 26, 2013 02:11AM
Keep in mind, the opinions on this site are for the most part speculation and are not necessarily the opinions of the company WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Its the regulators that allow the market to work this way, so they are accountable for inaction. Not only the whole commissions, but individuals of the regulatory bodies as well. And even the governors of the regulatory bodies. If not, it may also be considered entrapment under false pretences of security. The RCMP should be quite able to lay these types of charges, if they can,t, it only moreso proves up that we have no rights, this is a false democracy, and that in essence, we are all slaves to the rich. What is freedom? What is a Charter of Rights, an illusion?
This stock had a market cap of near $300 million, it is now around $6 million, not many shareholders have sold and we could not short. So, if you wonder where a big portion of your money went, it went to the shorters that seemed to have an uncanny shorting accuracy of 100% correct. An amazing record!!
The digital data banks of trading records, as well as the depository records will clearly show who did what and should be revealed to the public, in time, in this case. Confidentiality is supposedly not allowed to cover crime, if it does, then it suggests this mechanism is only in place to help criminals and should be abolished. Nothing like having everything out in the open, the truth. Whenever the truth gets suppressed, what does this suggest? To me, it suggests a restriction on truth and an enhancement to crime.
IMO