I would like to know why my post challenging "Bushboy's" incorrect assumptions was removed.

It was said in another post that he has a "deeper understanding" of the situation with SLI compared to other posters here, and I challenged that statement. Is that not allowed? Once somebody has stated that an individual poster has a deeper understanding than everyone else it cannot be challenged? It will remain an uncontested fact? Is Agoracom actually endorcing Bushboy as having a deeper understanding of SLI than the rest of us?

I disagreed, and stated that he did not have a "deeper understanding" than others; that is hardly an insult. I was removing him from an undeserved pedestal, which was elevating him above all others here. I did not call him names or throw insults at him. I stated clearly and consisely how his position has been based on fundimentally flawed assumptions. If a poster has made critical, incorrect assumptions to base their position on, how can they have a better understanding than everyone else? "Less" than others would be more appropriate would it not? Is the forum not for debate? Is that not exactly what I was doing?

I would like to know which rule I broke.

Thanks in advance.