Murry was voted in by the shareholders and to my understanding he was not due for election until next year. If there was a requirement of the exchange to non stagger the board of directors, Murry,s name should have been on the White Proxy for the shareholders to decide whether they wanted Murry back in or not. So, either the Exchange or Lori are responsible for this measure that also contradicts the best interests of the majority shareholders as well as Murry,s. Robert Krause will most likely be forced to resign in the future letting Murry resume his role for his full term as director, if he wishes. Again, its the regulators responsibility to ensure that fair security laws are implimented and upheld in these public trading companies as a protective measure against these kind of proposterous attempts.

IMO