I respect the company for verifying my post that I put on about the Cueva Blanca as being accurate. They must read the boards, because as you see, they titled this
"Response to "Sculpins" Concerns regarding SLI response to 150K ounces of gold on the Cueva Blanca property."
And here is their reply, the bolded portion below is my doing to point out the verification;
The historical estimate for the Cueva Blanca project is historical in nature, and although calculated from deemed reliable sources, cannot be relied upon. A qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as a current 43-101 mineral resource or mineral reserve, and St. Elias is not treating the historical estimate as a current 43-101 mineral resource or reserve. Insufficient work has been completed by St. Elias or IntiGold to verify the reported historical data and that no mineral resource occurs within the Cueva Blanca property.
Although the quotes and excerpts quoted on the Agoracom link are accurate – Brophy and Sivertz did this work, St. Elias is treating the historical estimate only as a guideline in determining potential future mineral resources or mineral reserves, and not as current mineral resources or mineral reserves.
Here is a link to my post they are referring to;
thank you
sculpin
