Still missing information, I was hoping to see where all 11 holes physically were. However, I do agree Kemo, it does look encouraging. It would still be nice to see a cutoff of 0.5g/T.

In that cut & paste you did from the NR (37.85M), they could have also added :

0.72M @ 1.508g/T

1.0M @ 1.051g/T

0.8M @ 1.594g/T

I see the mistake on Hole 7 is corrected, it turned out to be 0.21M @ 1.252 g/T , not 5.21M (that's too bad)

From the NR:

The large "ovoid" geophysical (chargeability) anomaly identified by the Quantec Titan 24 Survey at depth on the Property has been limitedly tested by diamond drilling on this round of drilling.