Thanks BOW2U, that's what I was looking for. There is nothing wrong with your method or your math, IMO. I like numbers....so tonight I'm going to do the calculation myself. Back when we were only considering the original ovoid, we were using the same math/method. Your assumptions are conservative. And the result is over 100 million ounces. I can see how some might find that number unrealistic. Personally I do not find it unrealistic, in fact, IMO that number agrees very well with everything we have learned about the incredible potential of the property. Even if we're out by 50%, we're still looking at 50 million ounces.....should the drills verify the Quantec data!!