Solid foundations. New horizons.

Free
Message: Re: My take
8
Jun 11, 2014 11:38AM
1
Jun 11, 2014 12:05PM
7
rst
Jun 11, 2014 12:11PM
4
Jun 11, 2014 12:11PM

Do we actually know that the Whittle modelling was constrained and limited to the HGZ only? I think so. If that is the case, then the LGZ is uneffected by the result, Whittle makes no comment on the LGZ or chages it's feasability to be a mine. This would be great and would put our sp back way over $3.00 once the shorts are done and the NR is fully analysed. So 2 mines, 2.3MM HGZv = underground and 4.3MM LGZ = open pit, totalling 6.6MM? And the HGZ is now de-risked by conservative Whittle modeling.

9
Jun 12, 2014 10:53PM
6
Jun 13, 2014 09:12AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply