"Maybe later."

Exactly.  Complaining about the name, under present circumstances, is irrelevant.  Besides, drilling could confirm uranium at depth anyway, as uranium has been overlooked in Arizona copper mines, but is proving now to be found in dumps. 

The larger versions of such mines globally are called UOCG deposits - Uranium oxide, copper, gold.  Where such mines exit, they are the largest on earth.

Technically, I'm not sure Hay Mountain qualifies for the IOCG distinction just yet, because if uranium is there in economic grades (and it is thought to be), it is very deep.  But we do have exposures of copper and gold in that order, plus other metals.  

...guess the name will just have to stay the same until drilling confirms, or eliminates uranium as part of the company name, however much that may displease some.