VP- All your points are well taken. As for the Big Chunk hole- it's certainly true that we don't know the actual results. But it is still not totally unreasonable to speculate that there were possibly good results without it being totally wishful thinking. In any case, this was mentioned only in passing- and-either way- not central to my main point- which was- that we might aim for a less ambitious intial drilling program, with the goal not being to fully map the HM claim, but rather- with good results, to attract further funds which would then allow a full scale drilling campaign to be completed. It does require some optimism and hope- but hasn't this whole business? And if still not easily achievable- at least easier than an initial goal 5 to 6 times more costly. I'm glad that you agree at least with the concept of lowering our sights to try to make it more feasable to possibly getting things started.