Interesting !-In August 3, 2015 for claim Construction patent # 331added to list
in response to
by
Message: Interesting !-In August 3, 2015 for claim Construction patent # 331added to list
In July 1 , 2014 e.Digital complaint against Dropcam includes total of 6 Nunchi infringement patents ( # 514 , # 522 , # 523 , # 524 , # 618 and # 619 ) but in recent Pacer for Claim construction prepared for coming August ,3 , the patent # 9002331 also added as 7 th patents for infringement.
--------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
E.DIGITAL CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
v.
DROPCAM, INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 3:14-cv-04922-JST
DECLARATION OF GABRIEL G.
HEDRICK IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFF’S OPENING CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION BRIEF (PATENT L.R.
4-5(a))
Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar
Ctrm: 9Hearing:
August 3, 2015
Time: 2:00 p.m.
I, Gabriel G. Hedrick, declare:
1. I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein, except for those matters stated under information and belief of which I am informed and believe to be true. If called as a witness, I could and would competently testify thereto.
2. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of California and am a member of the California State Bar. I am an associate with the law firm of Handal & Associates,
attorneys of record in this matter for Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation (“Plaintiff” or “e.Digital”).
3. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
E.DIGITAL CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
v.
DROPCAM, INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 3:14-cv-04922-JST
DECLARATION OF GABRIEL G.
HEDRICK IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFF’S OPENING CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION BRIEF (PATENT L.R.
4-5(a))
Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar
Ctrm: 9Hearing:
August 3, 2015
Time: 2:00 p.m.
I, Gabriel G. Hedrick, declare:
1. I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein, except for those matters stated under information and belief of which I am informed and believe to be true. If called as a witness, I could and would competently testify thereto.
2. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of California and am a member of the California State Bar. I am an associate with the law firm of Handal & Associates,
attorneys of record in this matter for Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation (“Plaintiff” or “e.Digital”).
3. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
8,311,522 (“the ’522 patent”).
4. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
8,306,514 (“the ’514 patent”).
5. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
8,311,523 (“the ’523 patent”).
6. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
8,311,524 (“the ’524 patent”).
7. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
8,315,618 (“the ’618 patent”).
8. Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
8,315,619 (“the ’619 patent”).
9. Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
9,002,331 (“the ’331 patent”).
10. Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of relevant portions of The Merriam-Webster Dictionary (Eleventh Edition 2004).
11. Attached hereto as Exhibit I is a true and correct copyof relevant portions of The American Heritage Dictionary (Fifth Edition 2012).
12. Attached hereto as Exhibit J is a true and correct copy of relevant portions of Barron’s Business Guides, Dictionary of Computer and Internet Terms (Eleventh Edition 2013).
13. Attached hereto as Exhibit K is a true and correct copy of relevant portions of the Oxford Dictionary of Science (Sixth Edition 2010).
14. Attached hereto as Exhibit L is a true and correct copy of relevant portions of The American Heritage Science Dictionary (First Edition 2011).
I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 10th day of June,11 2015 at San Diego, California.
/s/ Gabriel G. Hedrick
Gabriel G. Hedrick
8,306,514 (“the ’514 patent”).
5. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
8,311,523 (“the ’523 patent”).
6. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
8,311,524 (“the ’524 patent”).
7. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
8,315,618 (“the ’618 patent”).
8. Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
8,315,619 (“the ’619 patent”).
9. Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
9,002,331 (“the ’331 patent”).
10. Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of relevant portions of The Merriam-Webster Dictionary (Eleventh Edition 2004).
11. Attached hereto as Exhibit I is a true and correct copyof relevant portions of The American Heritage Dictionary (Fifth Edition 2012).
12. Attached hereto as Exhibit J is a true and correct copy of relevant portions of Barron’s Business Guides, Dictionary of Computer and Internet Terms (Eleventh Edition 2013).
13. Attached hereto as Exhibit K is a true and correct copy of relevant portions of the Oxford Dictionary of Science (Sixth Edition 2010).
14. Attached hereto as Exhibit L is a true and correct copy of relevant portions of The American Heritage Science Dictionary (First Edition 2011).
I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 10th day of June,11 2015 at San Diego, California.
/s/ Gabriel G. Hedrick
Gabriel G. Hedrick
16 Recommendations
Loading...
Loading...
9
Jun 16, 2015 11:19AM
New Message
Please
login
to post a reply