IMO, if Fred secured a Nunchi license, 2 or 3, and there was not an NDA attached, meaning the "customer" did not want them to disclose they had licensed the IP to incorporate into their product offerings, he'd send out a PR so fast we'd fall off our chairs.

Big CE outfits often do not want their "suppliers" named, by the supplier, with AAPL being a prime example.

I'm not expecting much more in the filing next week other than a generic comic such as wev'e seen in the past.

Now, if Dropcam all of a sudden settles, meaning whatever financial arrangement we wonn't be privy to, but the deal would mean they licensed Nunchi, my guess is others who know darn well they are infringing, may very well come to the table and license, than deal with the likes of Tony & Company.

Why?....from 8/13 PR...

Nunchi® lawsuit filed – The Company’s newest technologies embodied in its Nunchi® patents is demonstrating monetization promise. The Company recently identified several potential infringers of its Nunchi properties in the “connected” home security space. In July, the Company filed its first patent infringement lawsuit involving its Nunchi® portfolio against Dropcam, which uses various devices to communicate and monitor remote locations.

If that's not a public warning, I'll eat Maplecity's hat.