"CO Markman was a joke!"

I don't know what it was.

What I do know, for item B the sole memory issue....she did not rule on the full claim term ....and that is the mystery to me. ??

Why did she only rule on the first portion of the claim term....and gave no credence what so ever to the second portion as e.Digital considered in its claims construction?

It's my opinion that had she ruled on item A....what is "flash memory"? she would have had to rule on the second portion of item B and the sole memory issue would have not been a problem.

anyway

doni