Thanks letgo..
22.
3:13-cv-00781-DMS-WVG
Motion Hearing e.Digital Corporation v. Research in Motion Limited et al
::Plaintiff::
Pamela Chalk (619) 544-6400
Anton N Handal (619)544-6400
Gabriel G Hedrick (619)544-6400
::Defendant::
06/19/2013 (28-1) MOTION To Apply Collateral Estoppel
07/10/2013 (39-1) MOTION to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(C)
08/02/2013 01:30PM Motion Hearing - DMS
10/16/2013 09:00AM Early Neutral Evaluation - WVG
02/14/2014 01:30PM Status Conference - DMS
03/11/2014 09:00AM Claims Construction Hearing - DMS
03/12/2014 09:00AM Claims Construction Hearing - DMS
Notes:
================================================================
25.
3:13-cv-00785-DMS-WVG
Motion Hearing e.Digital Corporation v. Apple Inc.
::Plaintiff::
Pamela Chalk (619) 544-6400
Anton N Handal (619)544-6400
Gabriel G Hedrick (619)544-6400
::Defendant::
Sarah Elizabeth Barrows (415) 655-1251
06/19/2013 (31-1) MOTION to Apply Collateral Estoppel regarding Claim Construction Ruling in Prior e.Digital Case
07/08/2013 (35-1) MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings
08/09/2013 01:30PM Motion Hearing - DMS
10/09/2013 09:00AM Early Neutral Evaluation - WVG
02/14/2014 01:30PM Status Conference - DMS
03/11/2014 09:00AM Claims Construction Hearing - DMS
============================================================
Two defendants looking for rule12C....
e.Digitals response noted plural "defendants" ....
Little better understanding on that now, not that we want Apple to walk away on this technicality...
thanks
doni
