The USPO gives EDIG the patent rights and so say's that these belong to EDIG. Isn't it up to these other companies to show that they had a legal right to use what is in the domain of EDIG or that they have their own patent to what they are using.

If what belongs to EDIG is removed from the product and it no longer works does EDIG have a case? Yes. How then does it take years for these men who claim to be judges and knowledgeable not see it.

This meeting between the judge and the Black brigade of lawyers representing those companies did not offer one case that said they had the right to use what belonged to EDIG.What they did do was go back to a decision that was in error and made under a cloud because of a former dispute that created this flurry. If this judge does not see that , then what we have is a classic case of being screwed because of issues that have been dome in back rooms and closed doors. That the laywer for Apple had the termerity to suggest that it would be in the best interest of the judge if he saw it their ways suggest an attempt to a fix.

Now I am an old man and some how i recognize when an attempt was made to alter a decision in favor of Apple. There will be those here that might not see it that way but then there are always those that want to live in the dream world that all is fair and above board . Its not. The honesty of this Judge is now in question if not by most here then by me. Like I said most judges like to see settlements. This case is a land mark case of not letting the thieves to get away with it. It will settled the issue once and for all, that those that intend to steal ones idea or patents will pay an enourmous price for their action. Now lets see what these next two weeks produce. Justice or B.S.