Re: USPTO issued a Reexamination Certificate for Certificate for the ’774 patent

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

doni

Rank: President [?]

Points: 76204 [?]

Votes: 138 Score: 3.3 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: USPTO issued a Reexamination Certificate for Certificate for the ’774 patent

in response to

Re: USPTO issued a Reexamination Certificate for Certificate for the ’774 patent

cguilfor

posted on Jul 11, 2013 05:27PM

" infringers can't be allowed to claim that they are not liable for past damages. "

90/011,379

90/011,379 filed on 12-08-2010(5742737 : METHOD FOR RECORDING VOICE MESSAGES ON FLASH MEMORY IN A HAND HELD RECORDER) which is Pending claims the benefit of 08/229,731

This application is Re-examination of	08/810,210	03-03-1997	Patented	5,742,737
is a continuation of	08/339,976	11-15-1994	Abandoned	-
is a Continuation-in-part of	08/229,570	04-19-1994	Abandoned	-
is a Continuation-in-part of	08/229,731	04-19-1994	Patented	5,491,774

Child Continuity Data

--------------------------------------------------------------------

774 just need be held up to re-exam status with regard to the cases.

737 is the ticket as it did not change significantly, however, it is connected to 774 directly as a continuation.

There's no problem of "not liable for past damages. " with regard to 737 as long as 774 stands.