Re: USPTO issued a Reexamination Certificate for Certificate for the ’774 patent
posted on
Jul 11, 2013 05:27PM
" infringers can't be allowed to claim that they are not liable for past damages. "
90/011,379
90/011,379 filed on 12-08-2010(5742737 : METHOD FOR RECORDING VOICE MESSAGES ON FLASH MEMORY IN A HAND HELD RECORDER) which is Pending claims the benefit of 08/229,731
This application is Re-examination of | 08/810,210 | 03-03-1997 | Patented | 5,742,737 |
is a continuation of | 08/339,976 | 11-15-1994 | Abandoned | - |
is a Continuation-in-part of | 08/229,570 | 04-19-1994 | Abandoned | - |
is a Continuation-in-part of | 08/229,731 | 04-19-1994 | Patented | 5,491,774 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------
774 just need be held up to re-exam status with regard to the cases.
737 is the ticket as it did not change significantly, however, it is connected to 774 directly as a continuation.
There's no problem of "not liable for past damages. " with regard to 737 as long as 774 stands.
doni