Re: Old / turning off/on controler level, yup
in response to
by
posted on
Jul 03, 2013 02:28PM
''For the CE concerns...It's a combination of power saving circuitry issues, power saving processing issues, and the versatility of the packaged data.''
I can see how these 'embedded software commands' could benifit power within a device and within a platform running flash-memory templates vi a new a software OS pushing and pulling data; or even an underlying encription-esq method for privacy/security on said networks using their network protocal; but this 'transmission of data' is What and done How - We're told it's software; it must use MicroOS to preform these 'shut-down' mechanisms as well as the 'bad-block' configuring to make a package with great importance/versatility.
We really need to know what this 'New Technology' is - Exactly.
That's what I was trying to emphisise with the Intel thingy, 'We may have started to address these new needed 'hardware architectures' hurdles by introducing a nunchi that addresses both the soft and hard sensor CA power and versatility needs.
But nowhere in these approved patents does it imply a unique underlying micro structure - yet it must exist to be unique, so what are they withholding and-or working on. And yet they're able to market them?
UNCLE,,, I give -
It's time they give a little
emit...