A large HMMMM...... on the difference.

I`m sure the word game can be called into play since the 7/28/05 statement uses ``expects.`` No need to rehash the past ``expects`` and their ultimate results, but it does seem that the same word game played in the past continues today. I trust it is a minor deviation, but know nuttin` (stolen from somebody???)

The glass half-full side could guess that ``some`` orders that EDIG expected to ship, did not. They could be pushed into the next Q. If the actual number is close to the stated $1.6M, it will not be a big deal.

On the glass half-empty side, EDIG overstated once again. Nothing has changed.

I have no idea what EDIG is thinking other than their stated ``expectation`` for year over year revenue growth. If that happens and the SG & A costs remain low, good for EDIG. If not, we`ll need to take up a collection for foot removal services rendered.

...all IMO only with zero current facts to back anything up

John