Free
Message: Re: e.DIGITAL response to USPTO re " 774 patent" prior art issue ( 3 )
5
Jan 02, 2012 10:12AM
13
Jan 02, 2012 10:37AM
17
Jan 02, 2012 05:25PM
10
Jan 02, 2012 07:09PM
10
Jan 02, 2012 08:47PM
4
Jan 03, 2012 11:25AM
1
Jan 04, 2012 11:13AM

emit, myself, I never considered you gone, so I'm not saying welcome back.

Having the ability to manipulate circuits through the micro-controller/API[software] is what it has been about for a long time. It has always been my contention, that in some way, e.Digital would master a part of the industry with micro-controller offerings.....more or less competing with the issues being challenged by the law suits, such as the ZORAN controller identified in the Samsung case. The methods implemented by ZORAN clearly had to be the infringing issue.....Samsung may have some form of reprieve, however, I would say ZORAN does not.

It's not only about power savings and closing down DC to DC circuits....but methods of circuit control in general.

"It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous modifications to circuitry and design could be made the to embodiment disclosed herein. It is to be understood that such modifications are intended to be comprehended within the present invention, as defined by the following claims."

good luck emit.

sman, thanks for posting the 12v prior art comparative, being the VPP at the removable flash socket that I had commented on, and the noted deficiencies of the prior art.

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply